Showing posts with label FHA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FHA. Show all posts

1/09/2017

FHA Bullish Reduces MIP .25

Bullish on FHA loans

HUD announcement today January 9, 2017 to reduce MIP
premiums. 

Borrowers who close FHA mortgages after January 27 will pay 25 basis points less for the mortgage insurance premium, the Department of Housing and Urban Development said.
MIP is insurance for the lender, not Borrowers

Congress set certain liquidity rules for FHA.
Today HUD says reserve ratio stood at 2.32% last year, the second year in a row to exceed the 2% threshold.
“After four straight years of growth and with sufficient reserves on hand to meet future claims, it’s time for FHA to pass along some modest savings to working families,” HUD Secretary Julian Castro .
Unfortunately with mortgage rates rising, and expected to take two more leaps this year I don't think this black steer is going to be running out to apply for a home loan. Getting the loan closed with all the Dodd Frank rules is the real obstacle to real estate economic growth, that and affordable housing.
What does .25 in MIP mean in payment savings monthly? Perhaps about $12 dollars per $100000. monthly savings. This might be the difference in getting someone's debt to income ratio within approval, or not.

6/30/2016

Refinance Rules After Modification by Lender



Rules to Refinance AFTER Loan Modification

Mortgage RATES HAVE DIPPED AGAIN!!!!
Often Borrowers forget to tell Loan Officer/ Mortgage Banker that they completed a loan modification. Unfortunately these are handled like other credit dings such as Short Sales. One vital piece of information in determining the wait period is if forgiveness of debt (reduction of the loan amount was granted). This may not show on your credit report, however the information will be hung up with your laundry.

Below is a list of lenders and what their rules or wait periods are:


Refinance after Modification

FHA

3 year wait period if government assistance/principal write-down.
Exceptions to 3 years if substantial documentation of extenuating circumstances
Never less than 1 year.
Must have documented extenuating circumstances.
No lates on the mortgage in question in last 12 months
Must review all modification paperwork from lender.
Borrower must be in compliance with all lender’s requirements, such as occupancy time-frame, resale time-frame, if any.
Reason for short sale must be fully mitigated and supported by documentation.

Fannie requirements

Review all modification documentation and determine if there was principal forgiveness.
Obtain pay history from servicer (outside the credit report)
showing no 60 day lates in last 12 months. (as part of the deal the lender often agrees to waive or remove derogatory ratings.
Fannie wants to know if the borrower has been delinquent.)


CHASE requirements

4 year waiting with max 90 Loan to Value or Combined loan to value - in general HELOC seconds are NOT going to grant any new credit,
but a subordination of existing second may be arranged LTV/ CLTV.
7 year waiting for > 90 LTV/CLTV
3 year waiting if extenuating circumstances,
only on primary or NCO with up to 90 LTV/CLTV.
Must obtain explanation statement from borrower,
third party documentation confirming the events were isolated
and reduced Borrower income
Must review all modification paperwork from lender.
(Chase orders package from
lender not Borrower to avoid secrets)
Must go by more restrictive of these guidelines or AUS

Freddie Requirements

4 years wait
2 years wait with documented extenuating circumstances.
Must obtain explanation statement from borrower,
third party documentation confirming the events were isolated and reduced Borrower income
Must review all modification paperwork from lender.
Underwriter must comment on 1008

Wells Fargo Requirements

4 to 7 years wait
2 years wait if documented extenuating circumstance
Must review all modification paperwork from lender.
Minimum 680 credit score required
At least 10% down payment or greater if required by transaction
Reestablished credit

VA Requirements

Call the appropriate VA office to discuss the specifics of the case
Have lender modification documentation available
Depends on hardship (proof as with all these cases is a box
of paperwork to be verified)

June 2016 Caroline Gerardo copyright
(949) 784- 9699 cell
NMLS 324982
these rules of course can change

5/31/2016

Guild Mortgage To Go Down in Shame?


Captain's Chair hand made 1800's Who is running the ship?

United States Files Lawsuit Alleging That Guild Mortgage Improperly Originated and Underwrote FHA-Insured Mortgage Loans
The United States has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against Guild Mortgage Company (Guild) under the False Claims Act for improperly originating and underwriting mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the Justice Department announced today.  Guild is a mortgage lender headquartered in San Diego, California. 
“This case is another example of the  Justice Department’s continued efforts to ensure that lenders that participate in the FHA mortgage insurance program act in good faith and conduct appropriate due diligence when committing the United States to insure home loans,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.  “To protect the housing market and the FHA fund, we will continue to hold responsible lenders that knowingly violate the rules.”
Guild participated in the FHA insurance program as a direct endorsement (DE) lender.  As a DE lender, Guild had the authority to originate, underwrite and certify mortgages for FHA insurance.  If a DE lender such as Guild approves a mortgage loan for FHA insurance and the loan later defaults, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), FHA’s parent agency, is responsible for the losses resulting from the defaulted loan.  Under the DE lender program, neither the FHA nor HUD reviews the underwriting of a loan before it is endorsed for FHA insurance.  HUD therefore relies on DE lenders to follow program rules designed to ensure that they are properly underwriting and certifying mortgages for FHA insurance and DE lenders must certify that every loan endorsed for FHA insurance is underwritten according to the applicable FHA standards.

The government’s complaint alleges that, from January 2006 through December 2011, Guild knowingly submitted, or caused the submission of, claims for hundreds of improperly underwritten FHA-insured loans.  The complaint further alleges that Guild grew its FHA lending business by ignoring FHA rules and falsely certifying compliance with underwriting requirements in order to reap the profits from FHA-insured mortgages.  For example, Guild allegedly allowed underwriters to waive compliance with FHA requirements when underwriting a loan.  Additionally, Guild used unqualified junior-underwriters who did not have a DE certification to waive mandatory conditions on higher risk loans where HUD required underwriting only by highly trained DE underwriters. (so much for the days of processors signing off conditions)
The government’s complaint further alleges that Guild’s senior management focused on growth and profits and ignored quality.  From 2006 to 2012, Guild conducted at least 125 branch audits in which almost 40 percent resulted in either a qualified rating or unsatisfactory rating.  A qualified rating was defined as having a “significant number of findings, and/or findings noted that have more serious impact or risk to Guild,” or “Knowledge of procedures and controls; however, they appear to be inefficient.”  An unsatisfactory rating was defined as one where “serious concerns were noted: lack of knowledge, procedures, and/or controls in branch.”  The complaint alleges that, through Guild’s quality control reviews, significant defects were found in over 20 percent of the FHA loans reviewed between 2006 and 2011 and over half the loans had either significant or moderate defects.  Significant defects included fraud, misrepresentation and other serious findings while moderate defects included not following guidelines.  However, Guild did not calculate or distribute any error rate during the relevant time period, thus management was not presented with these findings.  Additionally, for many of the quarters from 2006 through 2009, Guild did not even distribute any of the quality control findings to management.  As a result, Guild management often did not review or remediate findings from quality control audits during these years.  In the quarters where Guild management actually did review quality control findings, it did so almost a year after the loans closed and failed to timely address any identified problems.  
In 2013, Guild finally began addressing the quality of its FHA underwriting, Guild’s head of quality control pointed out the ineffectiveness of its past efforts at addressing loan quality:  “I’m not optimistic about training reminders and individual follow-ups being all that effective.”
The government’s complaint alleges that as a result of Guild’s knowingly deficient mortgage underwriting practices, HUD has already paid tens of millions of dollars of insurance claims on loans improperly underwritten by Guild, and that there are many additional loans improperly underwritten by Guild that are currently in default and could result in further insurance claims on HUD.  For example, the government’s complaint identifies a mortgage loan that was improperly underwritten in violation of HUD requirements, causing the borrower to default and HUD to pay the loss on the loan.  Specifically, Guild failed to verify the borrower’s prior rental payments, overstated the borrower’s income, failed to develop a credit history for the borrower who had no credit score, exceeded FHA’s qualifying debt to income ratio without determining whether certain compensating factors were present, and failed to identify the source of a large deposit made to the borrower’s account.  The underwriter at Guild improperly waived multiple conditions and allowed an unauthorized junior underwriter to do the same for other conditions.  In sworn testimony, the Guild underwriter admitted the loan failed to comply with FHA underwriting requirements.
“The Federal Housing Administration’s insurance program is meant to encourage lenders to expand opportunity for homeownership by providing financing to prospective buyers who otherwise might not be able to enter the housing market,” said U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips for the District of Columbia.  “To ensure that prospective homebuyers realize the dream of long term homeownership, the program has strict rules and is not a license for lenders to carelessly subject federal dollars to risk. This lawsuit is designed to help the FHA – and American taxpayers -- recoup tens of millions of dollars in losses attributable to a lender accused of improperly underwriting FHA-insured mortgages and committing the government’s guarantee to mortgages that failed to comply with program rules.”
“The decision to intervene in this matter should serve as a reminder of the priority given to pursuing lenders that violate HUD program rules in order to hold them accountable and the value of private citizen participation, including whistleblowers, in pursuing lenders that violate the rules,” said HUD Inspector General David A. Montoya.
“FHA relies on the honesty and integrity of those lenders participating in our program,” said HUD’s General Counsel Helen R. Kanovsky.  “The action we take today should send a clear message that we will not tolerate the abuse of our programs or of the families who should benefit from them.”
Falsifying documents, white outs, blind eye, ignoring guidelines oh my oh my.
The lawsuit was brought under the qui tam, or whistle blower, provisions of the False Claims Act by a former employee of Guild.  Under the act, a private party may bring suit on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery.  The government may intervene in the case, as it has done here.  The False Claims Act allows the government to recover treble damages and penalties from those who violate it. This not a disgruntled employee to be this huge. Offices were disrupted by gentlemen in black suits, thousands of empty legal boxes and access to emails and computer files.
The investigation of this matter was a coordinated effort among HUD, its Office of Inspector General, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch.
The action is captioned United States ex rel. Dougherty v. Guild Mortgage Company (D.D.C.).  The claims asserted in the complaint are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.  

Losses to Guild could be in 100-600 millions'. 
Guild Mortgage does purchase, resale, and refinance mortgage loans. 
After decades of successful innovation and growth, Guild Mortgage Company is a mortgage banking company with more than 250 branches and satellites across the United States.

Guild may lose ability to sell loans to our government which is 99% of their business. What does this mean to the consumer? Apply somewhere else if your loan is in process. 

Martin Gleich frowns in his grave. A ship without a captain.
Mary Ann MCGarry who is at the helm?

Anyone who got a Guild FHA loan will line up for class action lawsuit next...



2/15/2016

2016 FHA Loan California

2106 California Counties FHA loan dollar amount limits
Each county defines what is a high balance loan according to HUD
Below is an alphabetical list of the County Name Single family residence
is left side to four unit owner occupied is on the right


 ALAMEDA County
SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND-HAYWARD, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

ALPINE County
NON-METRO

Single
$463,450
Duplex
$593,300
Tri-plex
$717,150
Four-plex
$891,250

AMADOR County
NON-METRO

Single
$332,350
Duplex
$425,450
Tri-plex
$514,300
Four-plex
$639,150

BUTTE County
CHICO, CA

Single
$293,250
Duplex
$375,400
Tri-plex
$453,750
Four-plex
$563,950

CALAVERAS County
NON-METRO

Single
$373,750
Duplex
$478,450
Tri-plex
$578,350
Four-plex
$718,750

COLUSA County
NON-METRO

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

CONTRA COSTA County
SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND-HAYWARD, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

DEL NORTE County
CRESCENT CITY, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

EL DORADO County
SACRAMENTO--ROSEVILLE--ARDEN-ARCADE, CA

Single
$474,950
Duplex
$608,000
Tri-plex
$734,950
Four-plex
$913,350

FRESNO County
FRESNO, CA

Single
$281,750
Duplex
$360,700
Tri-plex
$436,000
Four-plex
$541,800

GLENN County
NON-METRO

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

HUMBOLDT County
EUREKA-ARCATA-FORTUNA, CA

Single
$327,750
Duplex
$419,550
Tri-plex
$507,150
Four-plex
$630,300

IMPERIAL County
EL CENTRO, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

INYO County
NON-METRO

Single
$369,150
Duplex
$472,550
Tri-plex
$571,250
Four-plex
$709,900

KERN County
BAKERSFIELD, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

KINGS County
HANFORD-CORCORAN, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

LAKE County
CLEARLAKE, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

LASSEN County
SUSANVILLE, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

LOS ANGELES County
LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH-ANAHEIM, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

MADERA County
MADERA, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

MARIN County
SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND-HAYWARD, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

MARIPOSA County
NON-METRO

Single
$322,000
Duplex
$412,200
Tri-plex
$498,250
Four-plex
$619,250

MENDOCINO County
UKIAH, CA

Single
$373,750
Duplex
$478,450
Tri-plex
$578,350
Four-plex
$718,750

MERCED County
MERCED, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

MODOC County
NON-METRO

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

MONO County
NON-METRO

Single
$529,000
Duplex
$677,200
Tri-plex
$818,600
Four-plex
$1,017,300

MONTEREY County
SALINAS, CA

Single
$529,000
Duplex
$677,200
Tri-plex
$818,600
Four-plex
$1,017,300

NAPA County
NAPA, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

NEVADA County
TRUCKEE-GRASS VALLEY, CA

Single
$477,250
Duplex
$610,950
Tri-plex
$738,500
Four-plex
$917,800

ORANGE County
LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH-ANAHEIM, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

PLACER County
SACRAMENTO--ROSEVILLE--ARDEN-ARCADE, CA

Single
$474,950
Duplex
$608,000
Tri-plex
$734,950
Four-plex
$913,350

PLUMAS County
NON-METRO

Single
$336,950
Duplex
$431,350
Tri-plex
$521,400
Four-plex
$648,000

RIVERSIDE County
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO-ONTARIO, CA

Single
$356,500
Duplex
$456,350
Tri-plex
$551,650
Four-plex
$685,550

SACRAMENTO County
SACRAMENTO--ROSEVILLE--ARDEN-ARCADE, CA

Single
$474,950
Duplex
$608,000
Tri-plex
$734,950
Four-plex
$913,350

SAN BENITO County
SAN JOSE-SUNNYVALE-SANTA CLARA, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

SAN BERNARDINO County
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO-ONTARIO, CA

Single
$356,500
Duplex
$456,350
Tri-plex
$551,650
Four-plex
$685,550

SAN DIEGO County
SAN DIEGO-CARLSBAD, CA

Single
$580,750
Duplex
$743,450
Tri-plex
$898,700
Four-plex
$1,116,850

SAN FRANCISCO County
SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND-HAYWARD, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

SAN JOAQUIN County
STOCKTON-LODI, CA

Single
$333,500
Duplex
$426,950
Tri-plex
$516,050
Four-plex
$641,350

SAN LUIS OBISPO County
SAN LUIS OBISPO-PASO ROBLES-ARROYO GRAN

Single
$561,200
Duplex
$718,450
Tri-plex
$868,400
Four-plex
$1,079,250

SAN MATEO County
SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND-HAYWARD, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

SANTA BARBARA County
SANTA MARIA-SANTA BARBARA, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

SANTA CLARA County
SAN JOSE-SUNNYVALE-SANTA CLARA, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

SANTA CRUZ County
SANTA CRUZ-WATSONVILLE, CA

Single
$625,500
Duplex
$800,775
Tri-plex
$967,950
Four-plex
$1,202,925

SHASTA County
REDDING, CA

Single
$273,700
Duplex
$350,350
Tri-plex
$423,500
Four-plex
$526,350

SIERRA County
NON-METRO

Single
$304,750
Duplex
$390,100
Tri-plex
$471,550
Four-plex
$586,050

SISKIYOU County
NON-METRO

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

SOLANO County
VALLEJO-FAIRFIELD, CA

Single
$400,200
Duplex
$512,300
Tri-plex
$619,300
Four-plex
$769,600

SONOMA County
SANTA ROSA, CA

Single
$554,300
Duplex
$709,600
Tri-plex
$857,750
Four-plex
$1,065,950

STANISLAUS County
MODESTO, CA

Single
$276,000
Duplex
$353,300
Tri-plex
$427,100
Four-plex
$530,750

SUTTER County
YUBA CITY, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

TEHAMA County
RED BLUFF, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

TRINITY County
NON-METRO

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

TULARE County
VISALIA-PORTERVILLE, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250

TUOLUMNE County
SONORA, CA

Single
$331,200
Duplex
$424,000
Tri-plex
$512,500
Four-plex
$636,900

VENTURA County
OXNARD-THOUSAND OAKS-VENTURA, CA

Single
$603,750
Duplex
$772,900
Tri-plex
$934,250
Four-plex
$1,161,050

YOLO County
SACRAMENTO--ROSEVILLE--ARDEN-ARCADE, CA

Single
$474,950
Duplex
$608,000
Tri-plex
$734,950
Four-plex
$913,350

YUBA County
YUBA CITY, CA

Single
$271,050
Duplex
$347,000
Tri-plex
$419,425
Four-plex
$521,250 

2/09/2016

Mortgage after Foreclosure


A couple of people asked me about buying a home after foreclosure or short sale. We have a loan that a yea r after the event even a Bankruptcy we can offer a mortgage. You must demonstrate you paid your rents on time past twelve months. With 12 months reserves we can loan up to 85%. OR eight percent with three months reserves

Home Again product is a great loan for Borrowers to get into the market now. 
Usual waiting periods are as follows:
Foreclosure: 7 years conventional loan, 3 years FHA 2 Years VA and 3 years USDA. 
Short Sale: 4 years conventional, 3 years FHA, no wait VA, 3 years USDA

Rates are higher on this product than government loans.

The investor expects as soon as the “waiting period” ends the loan is running off hence the higher rates. DON’T LET THIS SCARE YOU AWAY.

Sometimes paying a higher rate for THE RIGHT PROPERTY (kitchen, backyard, pool, sunset etc…) TODAY beats buying the JUST OK one in the future. Limited supply means you have to buy when the RIGHT PROPERTY comes on the market. Yes you might pay $18,000 in higher interest for 12 months (which is tax deductible). So what, it beats buying an inferior property in 12 months and having to improve it $45,000 because there is nothing on the market

There are more people in the penalty box than you think. Just because your borrower didn’t lose their primary residence doesn’t mean that pesky foreclosure on that vacation home in the desert, mountains or lake  isn’t hindering their ability to upsize or downsize.



12/16/2015

Asset Documentation for Mortgage Loans

Asset Documentation Facts

ASSET DOCUMENTATION FAQ
NSF’s
1) In regards to non sufficient funds NSFs and pulling money from an attached savings account - FHA HOC has stated if it has an account set up, the borrowers account pulls the OD and there are no fee's it is not considered an NSF?
a. Yes, that would be correct. Not a derogatory situation.

UTMA accounts
2) What about an account that has ITF (In Trust for)
a. That could be an acceptable account to use for transactional funds. Depends on the account owners.

3) I have used a UTMA as long as the funds were transferred to the buyers own account. Is this acceptable?
a. Not for conventional loans.
b. FHA - case by case with review by underwriting manager.

4) Going back to UTMA accounts, if the funds are transferred into the borrower’s account, can they be used.
a. Conventional programs - no
b. Government programs - case by case with management direction.
401K loans /reserves

5) Guidelines have stated in the past, if the loan is secured by a 401k if we are not obtaining this account and using it we now have to hit them with the loan is that accurate?
a. For 2100 program, yes, that is correct if the remaining balance of the asset does not support the amount of the loan against it. This is an investor overlay, not a Fannie or Freddie requirement.

6) Regarding 401K loans, we only need to hit them with the loan payment (if they don't have at least the amount of the loan amount remaining as their balance) on Conventional & Jumbo only, correct?
a. This is a Chase requirement for both conforming and non-conforming loans and is therefore an overlay to our generic programs.

7) Regarding reserves that are needed for a 30 day account, does it have to be liquid or can an IRA, 401k and/or stock account be used?
a. Any asset that would qualify as reserves.

8) Regarding 401k's as reserves, I believe we used to use 401k's if they had hardship OR loan availability, can you please clarify/confirm that we are now only allowed to use a 401k if they have hardship?
a. You can use as reserves as long as the borrower can access a hardship withdrawal or a loan, using only the amount of the maximum loan available.

9) Can we get clarification of the 401K used as reserves? We have accepted reserves that were in the form of an available loan only and used just the available loan balance, not 60% because the available loan was less. Is that not acceptable?
a. Researching revealed that is acceptable.

10) Can we get some additional clarification on the terms of withdraw. We are collecting specific to the employer’s plan.
a. Yes, that is correct.
Gifts
11) Are both owners of the Donor account required to sign the gift letter?
a. One owner is sufficient.
12) Why is a cousin not considered an acceptable donor?
a. They are not on the FHA list of relatives. They may qualify under the category of a close friend with a clearly defined and documented interest in the Borrower.
13) Regarding gift funds on FHA, the email stated if the gift funds were already deposited into the borrower bank account we were to use LP only. Not on all gifts. Can you please clarify?
a. You are correct.

14) Gift deposited on FHA using DU, it never said we had to use LP only.

16) How do we verify or determine an amount on a "large deposit" into a donor's account when we don't know their income to come up with the large deposit amount?
a. Underwriter's discretion - any deposit prior to the gift giving date if similar to the gift amount or not identifiable as donor's income/payroll.
17) Run LP for FHA loans with gift funds OR with gift funds already deposited to borrowers account?
a. For gift funds already deposited to borrower's account, please use LP.
18) On a gift letter - if the donor money comes from a joint account are we requiring that both donor's sign the gift letter?
a. One donor is sufficient.
19) Can the gift donor be a cousin?
a. No, a cousin is not considered a relative under FHA guidelines. They would have to qualify as a close friend with a clearly defined and documented interest in the Borrower.

20) Can the gift donor be a future father in law?
a. He would not fall under family. The future part makes him ineligible. But for FHA would qualify as an acceptable gift donor if they can document he is a close friend with a clearly defined and documented interest in the borrower.
21) If the donor signs a statement stating no deposits have come from another person in the transaction do they still have to source the deposits?
a. Underwriter discretion depending on the size of the deposits, etc.
22) On a gift, we have to document the donor’s ability to gift even if it is a Conventional loan?
a. No, just on FHA loans.
23) So the donor’s ability is only on FHA.
a. Yes.
24) Home in 5 gift funds do we need to run LP?
a. Recommend running LP for all FHA loans with gift funds.
25) Donor's ability is also on USDA, correct?
a. Yes, and gift cannot be used for reserves.
Large Deposits
26) LARGE DEPOSITS: How does the UW determine what can or cannot be disallowed to remain under program 2100?
a. Funds not needed for cash to close or reserves but need a borrower explanation for the deposit(s) and why it cannot be documented.
27) If there is a large deposit from an unsecured line of credit and borrower has since depleted it are we ok as is to use the recent balance?
a. If the unacceptable funds have been spent outside of our transaction requirements, then you can consider the current balance in the asset account.

28) Is large deposit considered over $100, or $500, or $1000?
a. Please consult the large deposit policy in each program matrix.
Acceptable Receipt of Documentation
29) Are bank screen shots acceptable? i.e it's not a cell phone screen, and it's not a pdf printout but it does show the url via the screen shot, is that acceptable?
a. As long as it contains all the required information, ie: account holder name, account number, and the 30 day/60 day history and covers all transaction types.
30) What if it is a 'scanned' document sent via phone.
a. OK if has URL or all required information
31) TD bank doesn't show the URL on them when we do a print out just FYI.
a. Then must obtain full bank statements
32) What happens when the running totals are not available? Not all banks have the running balance on their Transaction History.
a. Must have ending balance and all required information including URL.
33) I learned with a borrower that if the URL is not printing on the statements they print at home, have them adjust the header/footer and it will usually pop up.

34) Can you clarify if the transaction history alone (as long as it contains all necessary info) is sufficient, or if we need to also have an actual bank statement with the transaction history?
a. You have to have a statement to use with the transaction history as usually the transaction history does not show the full account number/bank information/borrowers full name or joint names. If you are using the transaction history it needs to have all that information and I would get it stamped by the bank to show it as certified….
35) What types of images should Borrowers not download?
HTML doesn't flow, cell phone pictures are blurry, GIF doesn't save 

36) Are Cell Phone images acceptable?
a. If Government / Conventional (non bond) – we accept any clear & complete copy of the document.
b. If it is Bond / Jumbo – we cannot accept documents from a cell image at this time.
Destiny Input
37) For the bank address, use the local branch address or the bank address on the statement?
a. Either is fine.
38) Certain jumbo investors require asset addresses on the 1003.
a. Asset addresses are required for all loans.
39) Is this Max Cash to Close, a pre-existing condition or are we to free hand this?
a. It is a default condition that you can change
40) Are you allowed to use last 4 digits of acct numbers?
a. No, please use the full account number.
41) Regarding the address that we use on the bank statement - do we use what is on the statements or the physical address they bank at locally?
a. Either is fine.
Secured Borrowed Funds
42) Do we need to add the address of the 401k company under the secured borrowed funds?
a. Yes, so QC can re-verify.

43) Can we get clarification on the amount we are using to determine if we hit the borrower with a payment for secured borrowed funds? Specifically, do we take the remaining balance multiplied by 60% then subtract the loan amount?
a. Value or balance of the account must be sufficient to repay the loan obligation. When the account balance is less than the loan balance, transaction requires payment to be included in DTI calculation. (ch)(No reduction % required).
Miscellaneous
44) What's an mri?
a. Minimum Required Investment.
45) Are there any situations where we can use a VOD in place of a bank statement if the borrower is unable to provide?
a. Conventional agency programs. Check the product matrices for specific investor programs.
46) If stamped statement from the bank....does every page have to be stamped?
a. Yes please.
47) If an Ex paid a debt off for the Buyer and they are not on good terms with the Buyer any longer and will not provide the source of paying the debt off, what is the next option?
a. Debt payoff can only come from a gift from a relative. Ex-spouse is not a relative. Payoff would be considered a concession or contribution to our transaction by an unacceptable source and the amount would be deducted from acquisition before determining the "lendable" mortgage amount.
And some images by my son Carson since you read all this
mortgage information this far down as eye assets:










Keep working C G :)